Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude 3.5 SonnetQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
CompanyAnthropicAlibaba
Release DateJune 21, 2024September 9, 2025
Parameters80B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)200K66K
Context (output)200K66K
Input Price / 1M$3.00$0.15
Output Price / 1M$15.00$1.50
Average Score0.80.9

Verdict

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude 3.5 Sonnet — 0.8, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is 10.9x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $3.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports a larger context: 200K vs 66K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is newer: released 9/9/2025 vs 6/21/2024.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $3.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports a larger context: 200,000 tokens vs 65,536.

The Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.