Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek-V3.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek-V3.1
CompanyAnthropicDeepSeek
Release DateFebruary 29, 2024January 9, 2025
Parameters671B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)200K164K
Context (output)200K164K
Input Price / 1M$15.00$0.27
Output Price / 1M$75.00$1.00
Average Score0.80.8
Benchmarks
GPQA0.50.8
MMLU-Pro0.70.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude 3 Opus
DeepSeek-V3.1
GPQA0.5 vs 0.8
0.5
0.8
MMLU-Pro0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8

Verdict

DeepSeek-V3.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude 3 Opus — 0.8, DeepSeek-V3.1 — 0.8.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V3.1 is 70.9x cheaper: input $0.27/1M vs $15.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200K vs 164K tokens.

Recency

DeepSeek-V3.1 is newer: released 1/9/2025 vs 2/29/2024.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek-V3.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek-V3.1?
DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper for input: $0.27 per 1M tokens vs $15.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek-V3.1?
Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200,000 tokens vs 163,840.

The Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek-V3.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek-V3.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.