Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release Date | February 29, 2024 | February 19, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 200K | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 200K | 66K |
| Input Price / 1M | $15.00 | $2.50 |
| Output Price / 1M | $75.00 | $15.00 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.5 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude 3 Opus
Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPQA0.5 vs 0.9
0.5
0.9
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude 3 Opus — 0.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8.
API Cost
Gemini 3.1 Pro is 5.1x cheaper: input $2.50/1M vs $15.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 200K tokens.
Recency
Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 2/29/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper for input: $2.50 per 1M tokens vs $15.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 200,000.
The Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 3.1 Pro page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.