Claude 3 Opus vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude 3 Opus | K-EXAONE-236B-A23B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | LG AI Research |
| Release Date | February 29, 2024 | December 30, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 236B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 200K | 33K |
| Context (output) | 200K | 33K |
| Input Price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.60 |
| Output Price / 1M | $75.00 | $1.00 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| MMLU-Pro | 0.7 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude 3 Opus
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
MMLU-Pro0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
Verdict
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude 3 Opus — 0.8, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B — 0.8.
API Cost
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 56.3x cheaper: input $0.60/1M vs $15.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200K vs 33K tokens.
Recency
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is newer: released 12/30/2025 vs 2/29/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude 3 Opus or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude 3 Opus or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $15.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude 3 Opus or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?
Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200,000 tokens vs 32,768.
The Claude 3 Opus and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude 3 Opus or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.