Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
CompanyAnthropicMeta
Release DateFebruary 29, 2024December 6, 2024
Parameters70B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)200K128K
Context (output)200K128K
Input Price / 1M$15.00$0.88
Output Price / 1M$75.00$0.88
Average Score0.80.8
Benchmarks
MATH0.60.8
HumanEval0.80.9
MMLU0.90.9
MGSM0.90.9
MMLU-Pro0.70.7
GPQA0.50.5

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude 3 Opus
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MATH0.6 vs 0.8
0.6
0.8
HumanEval0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
MMLU0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
MGSM0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
MMLU-Pro0.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
GPQA0.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5

Verdict

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude 3 Opus — 0.8, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct — 0.8.

API Cost

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 51.1x cheaper: input $0.88/1M vs $15.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200K vs 128K tokens.

Recency

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is newer: released 12/6/2024 vs 2/29/2024.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper for input: $0.88 per 1M tokens vs $15.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200,000 tokens vs 128,000.

The Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.