Claude 3 Opus vs MiniMax M2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude 3 Opus | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | MiniMax |
| Release Date | February 29, 2024 | December 22, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 200K | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 200K | 100K |
| Input Price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.30 |
| Output Price / 1M | $75.00 | $1.20 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| MMLU-Pro | 0.7 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude 3 Opus
MiniMax M2.1
GPQA0.5 vs 0.8
0.5
0.8
MMLU-Pro0.7 vs 0.9
0.7
0.9
Verdict
MiniMax M2.1 leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude 3 Opus — 0.8, MiniMax M2.1 — 0.9.
API Cost
MiniMax M2.1 is 60.0x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $15.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 200K tokens.
Recency
MiniMax M2.1 is newer: released 12/22/2025 vs 2/29/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude 3 Opus or MiniMax M2.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude 3 Opus or MiniMax M2.1?
MiniMax M2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $15.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude 3 Opus or MiniMax M2.1?
MiniMax M2.1 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000.
The Claude 3 Opus and MiniMax M2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude 3 Opus or MiniMax M2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.