Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen3 235B A22B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 235B A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Release Date | February 29, 2024 | April 28, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 235B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 200K | 128K |
| Context (output) | 200K | 128K |
| Input Price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.20 |
| Output Price / 1M | $75.00 | $0.60 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| MMLU | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| GSM8k | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude 3 Opus
Qwen3 235B A22B
MMLU0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
GSM8k0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude 3 Opus — 0.8, Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9.
API Cost
Qwen3 235B A22B is 112.5x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $15.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200K vs 128K tokens.
Recency
Qwen3 235B A22B is newer: released 4/28/2025 vs 2/29/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $15.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Claude 3 Opus supports a larger context: 200,000 tokens vs 128,000.
The Claude 3 Opus and Qwen3 235B A22B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3 235B A22B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.