Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash comes from DeepSeek. Both were released in September 2026. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a published size of about 552 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Fable 5.1.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. They split them evenly, 1 to 1. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 4.0, where Claude Fable 5.1 scores 55.8% against 31.2%; AutomationBench, where DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores 54.8% against 31.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Fable 5.1 sits at 59.7% and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at 60.9%.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is the cheaper API at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens, roughly 33 times cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $10 and $50. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Both accept text and images as input.

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5.1DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
CompanyAnthropicDeepSeek
Release DateSeptember 1, 2026September 10, 2026
Parameters552B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K393K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.30
Output Price / 1M$50.00$1.20
Average Score59.7%60.9%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 4.055.8%31.2%
AutomationBench31.4%54.8%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.00.6 vs 0.3
0.6
0.3
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5

Verdict

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 40.0x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 9/1/2026 and 9/10/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.