Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release Date | September 1, 2026 | July 31, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 304B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 128K | 393K |
| Input Price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.14 |
| Output Price / 1M | $50.00 | $0.28 |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Verdict
Claude Fable 5.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 — 0.7.
API Cost
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is 142.9x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.
Recency
Claude Fable 5.1 is newer: released 9/1/2026 vs 7/31/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is cheaper for input: $0.14 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.
The Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.