Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release Date | September 1, 2026 | August 21, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 128K | 393K |
| Input Price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.22 |
| Output Price / 1M | $50.00 | $0.66 |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AutomationBench | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude Fable 5.1
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.3
0.3
0.3
Verdict
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — 0.5.
API Cost
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 68.2x cheaper: input $0.22/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Same context size: 1M tokens.
Recency
Both models were released around the same time: 9/1/2026 and 8/21/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is cheaper for input: $0.22 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.
The Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.