Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release Date | September 1, 2026 | August 13, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 1.6T |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 128K | 393K |
| Input Price / 1M | $10.00 | $1.32 |
| Output Price / 1M | $50.00 | $3.96 |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.8 |
Verdict
Claude Fable 5.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 — 0.8.
API Cost
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is 11.4x cheaper: input $1.32/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.
Recency
Claude Fable 5.1 is newer: released 9/1/2026 vs 8/13/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is cheaper for input: $1.32 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.
The Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.