Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5.1GPT-5.6 Luna
CompanyAnthropicOpenAI
Release DateSeptember 1, 2026July 9, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.20
Output Price / 1M$50.00$1.20
Average Score0.60.5
Benchmarks
OSWorld 2.00.80.5
AutomationBench0.30.1

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-5.6 Luna
OSWorld 2.00.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.1
0.3
0.1

Verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, GPT-5.6 Luna — 0.5.

API Cost

GPT-5.6 Luna is 42.9x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Fable 5.1 is newer: released 9/1/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Luna comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Luna page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.