Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
CompanyAnthropicOpenAI
Release DateSeptember 1, 2026September 3, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$10.00
Output Price / 1M$50.00$50.00
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.10.50.6
AutomationBench0.30.4
OSWorld 2.00.80.7
Terminal-Bench 4.00.60.6

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.10.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.4
0.3
0.4
OSWorld 2.00.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
Terminal-Bench 4.00.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

GPT-6 Astra leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, GPT-6 Astra — 0.7.

API Cost

API cost is identical: input $10.00/1M, output $50.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 9/1/2026 and 9/3/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra?
Claude Fable 5.1 is cheaper for input: $10.00 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.