Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5.1Grok 4.6
CompanyAnthropicxAI
Release DateSeptember 1, 2026August 12, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M500K
Context (output)128K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$2.00
Output Price / 1M$50.00$6.00
Average Score0.60.6
Benchmarks
CursorBench v3.20.70.7
GDPval-AA0.60.6

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1
Grok 4.6
CursorBench v3.20.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
GDPval-AA0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Claude Fable 5.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, Grok 4.6 — 0.6.

API Cost

Grok 4.6 is 7.5x cheaper: input $2.00/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 500K tokens.

Recency

Claude Fable 5.1 is newer: released 9/1/2026 vs 8/12/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is cheaper for input: $2.00 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 500,000.

The Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.6 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.