Claude Fable 5.1 vs Inkling: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic, while Inkling comes from Thinking Machines Lab. Inkling was released in July 2026, and Claude Fable 5.1 followed 2 months later in September 2026. Inkling has a published size of about 975 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Fable 5.1.

We have 7 benchmark results for Claude Fable 5.1 and 16 benchmark results for Inkling, but they overlap on a single test: GDPval-AA, where Claude Fable 5.1 scores 61.8% against 41.3%.

Inkling is the cheaper API at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.05 per million output tokens, roughly 11 times cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $10 and $50. Claude Fable 5.1 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 524K for Inkling. Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text and images as input, while Inkling accepts text, images, and audio. On tooling, only Claude Fable 5.1 supports function calling and only Claude Fable 5.1 offers structured output.

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5.1Inkling
CompanyAnthropicThinking Machines Lab
Release DateSeptember 1, 2026July 21, 2026
Parameters—975B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M524K
Context (output)128K524K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.95
Output Price / 1M$50.00$4.05
Average Score59.7%61.8%
Benchmarks
GDPval-AA61.8%41.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1
Inkling
GDPval-AA0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4

Verdict

Claude Fable 5.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, Inkling — 0.6.

API Cost

Inkling is 12.0x cheaper: input $0.95/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 524K tokens.

Recency

Claude Fable 5.1 is newer: released 9/1/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling?
Inkling is cheaper for input: $0.95 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 524,288.

The Claude Fable 5.1 and Inkling comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.