Claude Fable 5.1 vs Inkling-Small: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic, while Inkling-Small comes from Thinking Machines Lab. Inkling-Small was released in July 2026, and Claude Fable 5.1 followed 2 months later in September 2026. Inkling-Small has a published size of about 276 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Fable 5.1.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. Claude Fable 5.1 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on Humanity's Last Exam, where Claude Fable 5.1 scores 65.0% against 31.6%; GDPval-AA, where Claude Fable 5.1 scores 61.8% against 42.3%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Fable 5.1 sits at 59.7% and Inkling-Small at 60.3%.

Inkling-Small is the cheaper API at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens, roughly 33 times cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $10 and $50. Claude Fable 5.1 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 256K for Inkling-Small. Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text and images as input, while Inkling-Small accepts text, images, and audio. On tooling, only Claude Fable 5.1 supports function calling and only Claude Fable 5.1 offers structured output.

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5.1Inkling-Small
CompanyAnthropicThinking Machines Lab
Release DateSeptember 1, 2026July 30, 2026
Parameters—276B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M256K
Context (output)128K256K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.30
Output Price / 1M$50.00$1.20
Average Score59.7%60.3%
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam65.0%31.6%
GDPval-AA61.8%42.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1
Inkling-Small
Humanity's Last Exam0.7 vs 0.3
0.7
0.3
GDPval-AA0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4

Verdict

Claude Fable 5.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, Inkling-Small — 0.6.

API Cost

Inkling-Small is 40.0x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Claude Fable 5.1 is newer: released 9/1/2026 vs 7/30/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling-Small?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling-Small?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 256,000.

The Claude Fable 5.1 and Inkling-Small comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or Inkling-Small page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.