Claude Fable 5.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comes from NVIDIA. Claude Fable 5.1 was released in September 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) followed a month later in October 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has a published size of about 120 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Fable 5.1.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. Claude Fable 5.1 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on Humanity's Last Exam, where Claude Fable 5.1 scores 65.0% against 31.8%; GDPval-AA, where Claude Fable 5.1 scores 61.8% against 40.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Fable 5.1 sits at 59.7% and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) at 60.9%.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is the cheaper API at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens, roughly 50 times cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $10 and $50. Claude Fable 5.1 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B). Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text and images as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5.1Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
CompanyAnthropicNVIDIA
Release DateSeptember 1, 2026October 15, 2026
Parameters—120B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)128K262K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.20
Output Price / 1M$50.00$1.00
Average Score59.7%60.9%
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam65.0%31.8%
GDPval-AA61.8%40.4%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Humanity's Last Exam0.7 vs 0.3
0.7
0.3
GDPval-AA0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) — 0.6.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 50.0x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is newer: released 10/15/2026 vs 9/1/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Claude Fable 5.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The Claude Fable 5.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.