Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Fable 5.1 | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Release Date | September 1, 2026 | August 14, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 28B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 128K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $10.00 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $50.00 | — |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam | 0.7 | 0.3 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude Fable 5.1
Qwen3.8-27B
Humanity's Last Exam0.7 vs 0.3
0.7
0.3
Verdict
Claude Fable 5.1 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5.1 — 0.6, Qwen3.8-27B — 0.7.
Recency
Claude Fable 5.1 is newer: released 9/1/2026 vs 8/14/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.