Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Laguna S 2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic, while Laguna S 2.1 comes from Poolside. Laguna S 2.1 was released in July 2026, and Claude Haiku 5.5 followed 3 months later in October 2026. Laguna S 2.1 has a published size of about 118 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Haiku 5.5.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on SWE-Bench Pro, where Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 64.8% against 59.4%; SWE-bench Multilingual, where Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 83.7% against 78.5%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Haiku 5.5 sits at 57.7% and Laguna S 2.1 at 57.4%.

On price the two are close: Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, Laguna S 2.1 $0.10 and $0.20. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts text and images as input, while Laguna S 2.1 accepts text. On tooling, only Claude Haiku 5.5 supports function calling and only Claude Haiku 5.5 offers structured output.

CharacteristicClaude Haiku 5.5Laguna S 2.1
CompanyAnthropicPoolside
Release DateOctober 7, 2026July 21, 2026
Parameters—118B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K—
Input Price / 1M$0.10$0.10
Output Price / 1M$0.50$0.20
Average Score57.7%57.4%
Benchmarks
SWE-Bench Pro64.8%59.4%
SWE-bench Multilingual83.7%78.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5
Laguna S 2.1
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
SWE-bench Multilingual0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Haiku 5.5 — 0.6, Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 2.0x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $0.10/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Haiku 5.5 is newer: released 10/7/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Haiku 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Haiku 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $0.10.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Haiku 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Claude Haiku 5.5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Haiku 5.5 and Laguna S 2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Haiku 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.