Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Opus 4.5DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
CompanyAnthropicDeepSeek
Release DateNovember 23, 2025November 30, 2025
Parameters685B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)200K131K
Context (output)64K66K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$0.28
Output Price / 1M$25.00$0.42
Average Score0.90.9
Benchmarks
GPQA0.90.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.5 — 0.9, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) — 0.9.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is 42.9x cheaper: input $0.28/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.5 supports a larger context: 200K vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 11/23/2025 and 11/30/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 4.5 or DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 4.5 or DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is cheaper for input: $0.28 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 4.5 or DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?
Claude Opus 4.5 supports a larger context: 200,000 tokens vs 131,072.

The Claude Opus 4.5 and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.5 or DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.