Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | Zhipu AI |
| Release Date | February 4, 2026 | February 10, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 744B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 200K |
| Context (output) | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price / 1M | $5.00 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $25.00 | $0.00 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| BrowseComp | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6
GLM-5
BrowseComp0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
SWE-Bench Verified0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, GLM-5 — 0.7.
Programming
On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, GLM-5 — 0.8.
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1M vs 200K tokens.
Recency
Both models were released around the same time: 2/4/2026 and 2/10/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5?
On the SWE-Bench benchmark, GLM-5 shows a better result: 0.8 vs 0.8.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5?
GLM-5 is cheaper for input: $0.00 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000.
The Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.