Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic, while GPT-5.5 comes from OpenAI. Claude Opus 4.6 was released in February 2026, and GPT-5.5 followed 2 months later in April 2026.

The two models share 16 published benchmarks. GPT-5.5 leads on 9 of them, Claude Opus 4.6 on 7. The widest gaps are on Graphwalks parents >128k, where Claude Opus 4.6 scores 95.4% against 58.5%; Terminal-Bench 2.0, where GPT-5.5 scores 82.7% against 65.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Opus 4.6 sits at 74.8% and GPT-5.5 at 66.4%.

On price the two are close: Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens, GPT-5.5 $5 and $30. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 accepts text, images, audio, and video as input, while GPT-5.5 accepts text and images.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.5
CompanyAnthropicOpenAI
Release DateFebruary 4, 2026April 23, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$5.00
Output Price / 1M$25.00$30.00
Average Score74.8%66.4%
Benchmarks
Graphwalks parents >128k95.4%58.5%
Terminal-Bench 2.065.4%82.7%
FrontierSWE56.0%73.0%
ARC-AGI v268.8%85.0%
Graphwalks BFS >128k61.5%45.4%
MCP Atlas62.7%75.3%
CyberGym73.8%81.8%
MMMU-Pro77.3%83.2%
LiveBench76.3%80.7%
GPQA91.3%93.6%
Legal Agent Benchmark4.2%2.1%
MRCR v2 (8-needle)76.0%74.0%
TAU2 Telecom99.0%98.0%
Humanity's Last Exam53.1%52.2%
Finance Agent60.7%60.0%
BrowseComp84.0%84.4%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.5
Graphwalks parents >128k1.0 vs 0.6
1.0
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.00.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
FrontierSWE0.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7
ARC-AGI v20.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
Graphwalks BFS >128k0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
MCP Atlas0.6 vs 0.8
0.6
0.8
CyberGym0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
MMMU-Pro0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
LiveBench0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Legal Agent Benchmark0.0 vs 0.0
0.0
0.0
MRCR v2 (8-needle)0.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
TAU2 Telecom1.0 vs 1.0
1.0
1.0
Humanity's Last Exam0.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5
Finance Agent0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

GPT-5.5 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.7, GPT-5.5 — 0.7.

API Cost

Claude Opus 4.6 is 1.2x cheaper: input $5.00/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.5 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

GPT-5.5 is newer: released 4/23/2026 vs 2/4/2026.

More About These Models

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.5?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.5?
Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper for input: $5.00 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.