Claude Opus 4.6 vs Pixtral Large: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Opus 4.6Pixtral Large
CompanyAnthropicMistral AI
Release DateFebruary 4, 2026November 18, 2024
Parameters124B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M128K
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$2.00
Output Price / 1M$25.00$6.00
Average Score0.80.8

Verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, Pixtral Large — 0.8.

API Cost

Pixtral Large is 3.8x cheaper: input $2.00/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 4.6 is newer: released 2/4/2026 vs 11/18/2024.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 4.6 or Pixtral Large?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 4.6 or Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is cheaper for input: $2.00 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 4.6 or Pixtral Large?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000.

The Claude Opus 4.6 and Pixtral Large comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.6 or Pixtral Large page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.