Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic, while Qwen3.8 Max comes from Alibaba. Qwen3.8 Max was released in August 2026, and Claude Opus 5.5 followed a month later in September 2026. Qwen3.8 Max has a published size of about 2.4 trillion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Opus 5.5.

The two models share 5 published benchmarks. Claude Opus 5.5 leads on 5 of them. The widest gaps are on SWE-Bench Pro, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 89.9% against 67.7%; DeepSWE 1.1, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 74.2% against 56.6%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Opus 5.5 sits at 71.1% and Qwen3.8 Max at 71.0%.

Qwen3.8 Max is the cheaper API at $2.50 per million input tokens and $6.25 per million output tokens, about 60% below Claude Opus 5.5 at $4 and $20. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Both accept text and images as input.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max
CompanyAnthropicAlibaba
Release DateSeptember 22, 2026August 2, 2026
Parameters—2.4T
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$4.00$2.50
Output Price / 1M$20.00$6.25
Average Score71.1%71.0%
Benchmarks
SWE-Bench Pro89.9%67.7%
DeepSWE 1.174.2%56.6%
AutomationBench40.0%27.3%
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools, text-only)67.7%56.2%
HealthBench60.6%60.2%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5
Qwen3.8 Max
SWE-Bench Pro0.9 vs 0.7
0.9
0.7
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
AutomationBench0.4 vs 0.3
0.4
0.3
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools, text-only)0.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
HealthBench0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5.5 — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Max — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Max is 2.7x cheaper: input $2.50/1M vs $4.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 5.5 is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 8/2/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper for input: $2.50 per 1M tokens vs $4.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Claude Opus 5.5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Max comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.