Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5 is developed by Anthropic, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes from Xiaomi. Claude Opus 5 was released in July 2026, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash followed 2 months later in September 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a published size of about 309 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Opus 5.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. Claude Opus 5 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 4.0, where Claude Opus 5 scores 51.8% against 28.8%; DeepSWE 1.1, where Claude Opus 5 scores 68.8% against 67.9%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Opus 5 sits at 55.0% and MiMo-V2.6-Flash at 55.6%.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the cheaper API at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens, roughly 36 times cheaper than Claude Opus 5 at $5 and $25. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5 accepts text and images as input, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts text, images, audio, and video.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
CompanyAnthropicXiaomi
Release DateJuly 24, 2026September 22, 2026
Parameters—309B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K—
Input Price / 1M$5.00$0.14
Output Price / 1M$25.00$0.28
Average Score55.0%55.6%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 4.051.8%28.8%
DeepSWE 1.168.8%67.9%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.00.5 vs 0.3
0.5
0.3
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7

Verdict

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5 — 0.5, MiMo-V2.6-Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 71.4x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 7/24/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.14 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Claude Opus 5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Opus 5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.