Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is developed by Anthropic, while Kimi K3 comes from Moonshot AI. Kimi K3 was released in July 2026, and Claude Sonnet 5.5 followed 2 months later in September 2026. Kimi K3 has a published size of about 2.8 trillion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Sonnet 5.5.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads on 4 of them. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 44.7% against 30.8%; OfficeQA Pro, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 65.6% against 63.3%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Sonnet 5.5 sits at 67.4% and Kimi K3 at 67.8%.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the cheaper API at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, about 50% below Kimi K3 at $3 and $15. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Both accept text and images as input.

CharacteristicClaude Sonnet 5.5Kimi K3
CompanyAnthropicMoonshot AI
Release DateSeptember 28, 2026July 16, 2026
Parameters—2.8T
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K1.0M
Input Price / 1M$2.00$3.00
Output Price / 1M$10.00$15.00
Average Score67.4%67.8%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench44.7%30.8%
OfficeQA Pro65.6%63.3%
DeepSWE 1.171.0%69.0%
Program Bench79.7%77.8%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Kimi K3
AutomationBench0.4 vs 0.3
0.4
0.3
OfficeQA Pro0.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
Program Bench0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Sonnet 5.5 — 0.7, Kimi K3 — 0.7.

API Cost

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 1.5x cheaper: input $2.00/1M vs $3.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is newer: released 9/28/2026 vs 7/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper for input: $2.00 per 1M tokens vs $3.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Kimi K3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.