Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM-5.3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 is developed by Anthropic, while GLM-5.3 comes from Zhipu AI. Claude Sonnet 5 was released in June 2026, and GLM-5.3 followed 2 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.3 has a published size of about 753 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Sonnet 5.

The two models share 5 published benchmarks. GLM-5.3 leads on 5 of them. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where GLM-5.3 scores 48.2% against 13.5%; Terminal-Bench 4.0, where GLM-5.3 scores 41.8% against 12.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Sonnet 5 sits at 58.4% and GLM-5.3 at 52.2%.

GLM-5.3 is the cheaper API at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens, about 43% below Claude Sonnet 5 at $2 and $10. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Sonnet 5 accepts text and images as input, while GLM-5.3 accepts text.

CharacteristicClaude Sonnet 5GLM-5.3
CompanyAnthropicZhipu AI
Release DateJune 30, 2026August 14, 2026
Parameters753B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)64K131K
Input Price / 1M$2.00$1.40
Output Price / 1M$10.00$4.40
Average Score58.4%52.2%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench13.5%48.2%
Terminal-Bench 4.012.4%41.8%
Toolathlon54.3%73.0%
DeepSWE 1.154.0%66.9%
Humanity's Last Exam57.4%62.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5
GLM-5.3
AutomationBench0.1 vs 0.5
0.1
0.5
Terminal-Bench 4.00.1 vs 0.4
0.1
0.4
Toolathlon0.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
DeepSWE 1.10.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

GLM-5.3 leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Sonnet 5 — 0.6, GLM-5.3 — 0.5.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 is 2.1x cheaper: input $1.40/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 is newer: released 8/14/2026 vs 6/30/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Sonnet 5 or GLM-5.3?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Sonnet 5 or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 is cheaper for input: $1.40 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Sonnet 5 or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Sonnet 5 and GLM-5.3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Sonnet 5 or GLM-5.3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.