Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8 Flash
CompanyAnthropicAlibaba
Release DateJune 30, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters125B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)64K131K
Input Price / 1M$2.00$0.15
Output Price / 1M$10.00$0.47
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam0.60.4
Toolathlon0.50.7
DeepSWE 1.10.50.6
SWE-bench Multilingual0.80.8
CharXiv-R0.90.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.60.6

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5
Qwen3.8 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4
Toolathlon0.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
DeepSWE 1.10.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
SWE-bench Multilingual0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Sonnet 5 — 0.6, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash is 19.4x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 6/30/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.