DeepSeek-V3.1 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | DeepSeek-V3.1 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| Company | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
| Release Date | January 9, 2025 | September 28, 2025 |
| Parameters | 671B | 685B |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Context (input) | 164K | 164K |
| Context (output) | 164K | 66K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.27 | $0.27 |
| Output Price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.41 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Aider-Polyglot | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| GPQA | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| SimpleQA | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Aider-Polyglot0.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
GPQA0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
SimpleQA0.9 vs 1.0
0.9
1.0
MMLU-Pro0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
Verdict
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V3.1 — 0.8, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp — 0.8.
API Cost
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is 1.9x cheaper: input $0.27/1M vs $0.27/1M tokens.
Context Window
Same context size: 164K tokens.
Recency
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is newer: released 9/28/2025 vs 1/9/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V3.1 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V3.1 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?
DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper for input: $0.27 per 1M tokens vs $0.27.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V3.1 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?
DeepSeek-V3.1 supports a larger context: 163,840 tokens vs 163,840.
The DeepSeek-V3.1 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V3.1 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.