DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is developed by DeepSeek, while GLM-5.3 Flash comes from Zhipu AI. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released in July 2026, and GLM-5.3 Flash followed a month later in August 2026. The two are similar in size, at about 304 billion and 320 billion parameters respectively.

The two models share 5 published benchmarks. GLM-5.3 Flash leads on 5 of them. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where GLM-5.3 Flash scores 48.8% against 25.1%; Toolathlon, where GLM-5.3 Flash scores 78.4% against 70.0%. Averaged across everything we track, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 sits at 57.5% and GLM-5.3 Flash at 64.1%.

On price the two are close: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens, GLM-5.3 Flash $0.15 and $0.50. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 accepts text as input, while GLM-5.3 Flash accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-5.3 Flash
CompanyDeepSeekZhipu AI
Release DateJuly 31, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters304B320B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)393K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.14$0.15
Output Price / 1M$0.28$0.50
Average Score57.5%64.1%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench25.1%48.8%
Toolathlon70.0%78.4%
NL2Repo54.2%56.3%
Terminal-Bench 2.183.0%84.3%
Agents' Last Exam25.2%26.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
GLM-5.3 Flash
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
Toolathlon0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
NL2Repo0.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.3
0.3
0.3

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 — 0.6, GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is 1.5x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $0.15/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/31/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is cheaper for input: $0.14 per 1M tokens vs $0.15.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and GLM-5.3 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or GLM-5.3 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.