DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max vs Kimi K2.6: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxKimi K2.6
CompanyDeepSeekMoonshot AI
Release DateApril 23, 2026April 20, 2026
Parameters284B1.0T
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)393K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.14$1.20
Output Price / 1M$0.28$4.50
Average Score0.90.9
Benchmarks
HMMT Feb 260.90.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max
Kimi K2.6
HMMT Feb 260.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max — 0.9, Kimi K2.6 — 0.9.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is 13.6x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $1.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 4/23/2026 and 4/20/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Kimi K2.6?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Kimi K2.6?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is cheaper for input: $0.14 per 1M tokens vs $1.20.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Kimi K2.6?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 262,144.

The DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max and Kimi K2.6 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Kimi K2.6 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.