DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max vs Qwen3.7 Max: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxQwen3.7 Max
CompanyDeepSeekAlibaba
Release DateApril 23, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters284B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)393K66K
Input Price / 1M$0.14$2.50
Output Price / 1M$0.28$7.50
Average Score0.91.0
Benchmarks
HMMT Feb 260.91.0

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max
Qwen3.7 Max
HMMT Feb 260.9 vs 1.0
0.9
1.0

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max — 0.9, Qwen3.7 Max — 1.0.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is 23.8x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $2.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.7 Max is newer: released 5/19/2026 vs 4/23/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Qwen3.7 Max?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Qwen3.7 Max?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is cheaper for input: $0.14 per 1M tokens vs $2.50.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Qwen3.7 Max?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max and Qwen3.7 Max comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max or Qwen3.7 Max page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.