DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs GLM-5.3 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpGLM-5.3 Flash
CompanyDeepSeekZhipu AI
Release DateAugust 21, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)393K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.22$0.15
Output Price / 1M$0.66$0.50
Average Score0.50.6
Benchmarks
AutomationBench0.30.5
Agents' Last Exam0.30.3
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
GLM-5.3 Flash
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.3
0.3
0.3
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — 0.5, GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 1.4x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $0.22/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/21/2026 and 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3 Flash?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $0.22.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3 Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5.3 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.