DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Release Date | August 21, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 125B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 393K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.22 | $0.15 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.66 | $0.47 |
| Average Score | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Agents' Last Exam | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| NL2Repo | 0.6 | 0.5 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Qwen3.8 Flash
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
NL2Repo0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
Verdict
Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — 0.5, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.
API Cost
Qwen3.8 Flash is 1.4x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $0.22/1M tokens.
Context Window
Same context size: 1M tokens.
Recency
Both models were released around the same time: 8/21/2026 and 8/26/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $0.22.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Qwen3.8 Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.
The DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.