DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Gemini 3.8 Flash
CompanyDeepSeekGoogle
Release DateAugust 13, 2026September 2, 2026
Parameters1.6T
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)393K66K
Input Price / 1M$1.32$0.75
Output Price / 1M$3.96$3.75
Average Score0.80.6
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.10.90.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 — 0.8, Gemini 3.8 Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 1.2x cheaper: input $0.75/1M vs $1.32/1M tokens.

Context Window

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Gemini 3.8 Flash is newer: released 9/2/2026 vs 8/13/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.75 per 1M tokens vs $1.32.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.