DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs GLM-5.3 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is developed by DeepSeek, while GLM-5.3 Flash comes from Zhipu AI. Both were released in August 2026. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is the larger model at roughly 1.6 trillion parameters, against 320 billion for GLM-5.3 Flash.

The two models share 6 published benchmarks. They split them evenly, 3 to 3. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where GLM-5.3 Flash scores 48.8% against 31.8%; NL2Repo, where DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores 61.5% against 56.3%. Averaged across everything we track, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 sits at 60.6% and GLM-5.3 Flash at 64.1%.

GLM-5.3 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, roughly 9 times cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 at $1.32 and $3.96. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 accepts text as input, while GLM-5.3 Flash accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813GLM-5.3 Flash
CompanyDeepSeekZhipu AI
Release DateAugust 13, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters1.6T320B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)393K131K
Input Price / 1M$1.32$0.15
Output Price / 1M$3.96$0.50
Average Score60.6%64.1%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench31.8%48.8%
NL2Repo61.5%56.3%
Humanity's Last Exam60.0%55.3%
Toolathlon74.0%78.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.188.0%84.3%
Agents' Last Exam25.7%26.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
GLM-5.3 Flash
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
NL2Repo0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
Toolathlon0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.3
0.3
0.3

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 — 0.6, GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 8.1x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $1.32/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/13/2026 and 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $1.32.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and GLM-5.3 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5.3 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.