DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Laguna S 2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Laguna S 2.1
CompanyDeepSeekPoolside
Release DateAugust 13, 2026July 21, 2026
Parameters1.6T118B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)393K
Input Price / 1M$1.32$0.10
Output Price / 1M$3.96$0.20
Average Score0.80.6
Benchmarks
Toolathlon0.70.5
Terminal-Bench 2.10.90.7

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Laguna S 2.1
Toolathlon0.7 vs 0.5
0.7
0.5
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.7
0.9
0.7

Verdict

Laguna S 2.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 — 0.8, Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 17.6x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $1.32/1M tokens.

Context Window

Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is newer: released 8/13/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Laguna S 2.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Laguna S 2.1?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.32.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Laguna S 2.1?
Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Laguna S 2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Laguna S 2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.