DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Qwen3.6-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.6-27B
CompanyDeepSeekAlibaba
Release DateAugust 13, 2026April 21, 2026
Parameters1.6T28B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)393K66K
Input Price / 1M$1.32$0.60
Output Price / 1M$3.96$3.60
Average Score0.81.0

Verdict

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 — 0.8, Qwen3.6-27B — 1.0.

API Cost

Qwen3.6-27B is 1.3x cheaper: input $0.60/1M vs $1.32/1M tokens.

Context Window

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is newer: released 8/13/2026 vs 4/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3.6-27B is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $1.32.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.6-27B?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 262,144.

The DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.6-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.6-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.