Ember-1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber comes from Google. Both were released in September 2026. Ember-1 has a published size of about 2.8 trillion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.
We have 4 benchmark results for Ember-1 and 4 benchmark results for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.
Ember-1 is available through an API at $3 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | Ember-1 | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Fireworks AI | |
| Release Date | September 23, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Parameters | 2.8T | — |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $3.00 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $15.00 | — |
| Average Score | 78.8% | 74.6% |
Verdict
Ember-1 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Ember-1 — 0.8, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber — 0.7.
Ember-1 is newer: released 9/23/2026 vs 9/2/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Ember-1 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?
Which model is cheaper — Ember-1 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?
Which has a larger context window — Ember-1 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?
The Ember-1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ember-1 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.