Which is better for coding — Gemini 3 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.07 per 1M tokens vs $0.50.

Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Gemini 3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 128,000.

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	Gemini 3 Flash	GLM-4.7-Flash
Company	Google	Zhipu AI
Release Date	December 16, 2025	January 18, 2026
Parameters	—	30B
Multimodal	Yes	No
Context (input)	1.0M	128K
Context (output)	66K	16K
Input Price / 1M	$0.50	$0.07
Output Price / 1M	$3.00	$0.40
Average Score	0.9	0.6
Benchmarks
GPQA	0.9	0.8
AIME 2025	1.0	0.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

GPQA0.9 vs 0.8

0.9

0.8

AIME 20251.0 vs 0.9

1.0

0.9

Verdict

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3 Flash — 0.9, GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-4.7-Flash is 7.4x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $0.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

Gemini 3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.

Recency

GLM-4.7-Flash is newer: released 1/18/2026 vs 12/16/2025.

More About These Models

Gemini 3 Flash

Google — specs, benchmarks, API

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-5.1 High Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

All model comparisons →

The Gemini 3 Flash and GLM-4.7-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.