Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3 Pro is developed by Google, while Qwen3.5 122B A10B comes from Alibaba. Gemini 3 Pro was released in November 2025, and Qwen3.5 122B A10B followed 4 months later in March 2026. Qwen3.5 122B A10B has a published size of about 122 billion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3 Pro.

The two models share 11 published benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro leads on 10 of them, Qwen3.5 122B A10B on 1. The widest gaps are on t2-bench, where Gemini 3 Pro scores 85.4% against 79.5%; VideoMMMU, where Gemini 3 Pro scores 87.6% against 82.0%. Averaged across everything we track, Gemini 3 Pro sits at 70.5% and Qwen3.5 122B A10B at 70.9%.

Gemini 3 Pro is available through an API at $2 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Qwen3.5 122B A10B, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.

CharacteristicGemini 3 ProQwen3.5 122B A10B
CompanyGoogleAlibaba
Release DateNovember 17, 2025March 1, 2026
Parameters—122B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M—
Context (output)66K—
Input Price / 1M$2.00—
Output Price / 1M$12.00—
Average Score70.5%70.9%
Benchmarks
t2-bench85.4%79.5%
VideoMMMU87.6%82.0%
GPQA92.0%86.6%
MMMLU92.0%86.7%
Global PIQA93.4%88.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.054.2%49.4%
SWE-Bench Verified76.2%72.0%
CharXiv-R81.4%77.2%
MMMU-Pro81.0%76.9%
ScreenSpot Pro72.7%70.4%
Humanity's Last Exam45.8%47.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3 Pro
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
t2-bench0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
VideoMMMU0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
MMMLU0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Global PIQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Terminal-Bench 2.00.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5
SWE-Bench Verified0.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
CharXiv-R0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
MMMU-Pro0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
ScreenSpot Pro0.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
Humanity's Last Exam0.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5

Verdict

Qwen3.5 122B A10B leads in 1 out of 3 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3 Pro — 0.7, Qwen3.5 122B A10B — 0.7.

Programming

On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Gemini 3 Pro — 0.8, Qwen3.5 122B A10B — 0.7.

Recency

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is newer: released 3/1/2026 vs 11/17/2025.

More About These Models

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
On the SWE-Bench benchmark, Gemini 3 Pro shows a better result: 76.2% vs 72.0%.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.5 122B A10B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.5 122B A10B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.