Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Pixtral Large: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Mistral AI | |
| Release Date | February 19, 2026 | November 18, 2024 |
| Parameters | — | 124B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 128K |
| Context (output) | 66K | 128K |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.50 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M | $15.00 | $6.00 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8, Pixtral Large — 0.8.
API Cost
Pixtral Large is 2.2x cheaper: input $2.00/1M vs $2.50/1M tokens.
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.
Recency
Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 11/18/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.1 Pro or Pixtral Large?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.1 Pro or Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is cheaper for input: $2.00 per 1M tokens vs $2.50.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.1 Pro or Pixtral Large?
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 128,000.
The Gemini 3.1 Pro and Pixtral Large comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.1 Pro or Pixtral Large page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.