Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comes from NVIDIA. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released in July 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) followed a month later in August 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) has a published size of about 30 billion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

We have 6 benchmark results for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and 13 benchmark results for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B), but they overlap on a single test: Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 54.0% against 24.6%.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is the cheaper API at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 6 times cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at $0.30 and $2.50. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B). Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts text and images as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) accepts text.

CharacteristicGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
CompanyGoogleNVIDIA
Release DateJuly 21, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters30B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)66K262K
Input Price / 1M$0.30$0.05
Output Price / 1M$2.50$0.20
Average Score53.2%45.3%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.154.0%24.6%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
Terminal-Bench 2.10.5 vs 0.2
0.5
0.2

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite — 0.5, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.5.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 11.2x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $0.30/1M tokens.

Context Window

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is newer: released 8/11/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $0.30.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,100.

The Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.