Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.7 Flash | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | |
| Release Date | August 13, 2026 | April 7, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 754B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 200K |
| Context (output) | 66K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.75 | $1.40 |
| Output Price / 1M | $3.75 | $4.40 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
Verdict
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.7 Flash — 0.8, GLM-5.1 — 0.9.
API Cost
Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1.3x cheaper: input $0.75/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Context Window
Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 200K tokens.
Recency
Gemini 3.7 Flash is newer: released 8/13/2026 vs 4/7/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.1?
Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.75 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.1?
Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000.
The Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-5.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.