Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google, while GLM-5.2 comes from Zhipu AI. GLM-5.2 was released in June 2026, and Gemini 3.7 Flash followed 2 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.2 has a published size of about 753 billion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3.7 Flash.
We have 4 benchmark results for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 4 benchmark results for GLM-5.2, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens, about 87% below GLM-5.2 at $1.40 and $4.40. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts text and images as input, while GLM-5.2 accepts text.
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.7 Flash | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | |
| Release Date | August 13, 2026 | June 16, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 753B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 66K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.75 | $1.40 |
| Output Price / 1M | $3.75 | $4.40 |
| Average Score | 79.6% | 94.3% |
Verdict
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.7 Flash — 0.8, GLM-5.2 — 0.9.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1.3x cheaper: input $0.75/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Same context size: 1M tokens.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is newer: released 8/13/2026 vs 6/16/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.2?
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.2?
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.2?
The Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-5.2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.