Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.3 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google, while GLM-5.3 Flash comes from Zhipu AI. Both were released in August 2026. GLM-5.3 Flash has a published size of about 320 billion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3.7 Flash.

The two models share 7 published benchmarks. GLM-5.3 Flash leads on 4 of them, Gemini 3.7 Flash on 2. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where GLM-5.3 Flash scores 48.8% against 30.4%; GDPval-AA, where GLM-5.3 Flash scores 59.1% against 50.8%. Averaged across everything we track, Gemini 3.7 Flash sits at 59.8% and GLM-5.3 Flash at 64.1%.

GLM-5.3 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, roughly 5 times cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash at $0.75 and $3.75. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts text and images as input, while GLM-5.3 Flash accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-5.3 Flash
CompanyGoogleZhipu AI
Release DateAugust 13, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)66K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.75$0.15
Output Price / 1M$3.75$0.50
Average Score59.8%64.1%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench30.4%48.8%
GDPval-AA50.8%59.1%
DeepSWE 1.165.3%63.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.185.8%84.3%
Artificial Analysis56.0%57.0%
CharXiv-R88.7%89.4%
Agents' Last Exam26.3%26.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash
GLM-5.3 Flash
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
GDPval-AA0.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
Artificial Analysis0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.3
0.3
0.3

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.7 Flash — 0.6, GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 6.9x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $0.75/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/13/2026 and 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.3 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.3 Flash?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $0.75.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.3 Flash?
Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-5.3 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.3 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.