Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comes from NVIDIA. Gemini 3.7 Flash was released in August 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) followed 2 months later in October 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has a published size of about 120 billion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3.7 Flash.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash leads on 3 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Gemini 3.7 Flash scores 85.8% against 66.7%; GDPval-AA, where Gemini 3.7 Flash scores 50.8% against 40.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Gemini 3.7 Flash sits at 59.8% and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) at 60.9%.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is the cheaper API at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens, roughly 4 times cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash at $0.75 and $3.75. Gemini 3.7 Flash takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B). Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts text and images as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicGemini 3.7 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
CompanyGoogleNVIDIA
Release DateAugust 13, 2026October 15, 2026
Parameters—120B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)66K262K
Input Price / 1M$0.75$0.20
Output Price / 1M$3.75$1.00
Average Score59.8%60.9%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.185.8%66.7%
GDPval-AA50.8%40.4%
CharXiv-R88.7%80.8%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.7
0.9
0.7
GDPval-AA0.5 vs 0.4
0.5
0.4
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.7 Flash — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) — 0.6.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 3.8x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.75/1M tokens.

Context Window

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is newer: released 10/15/2026 vs 8/13/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.7 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.7 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.75.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.7 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The Gemini 3.7 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.7 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.