Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3 235B A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | August 13, 2026 | April 28, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 235B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 128K |
| Context (output) | 66K | 128K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.75 | $0.20 |
| Output Price / 1M | $3.75 | $0.60 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
Verdict
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.7 Flash — 0.8, Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9.
API Cost
Qwen3 235B A22B is 5.6x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.75/1M tokens.
Context Window
Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.
Recency
Gemini 3.7 Flash is newer: released 8/13/2026 vs 4/28/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.75.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000.
The Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3 235B A22B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.