Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Grok 4.7: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google, while Grok 4.7 comes from xAI. Both were released in September 2026.

We have 4 benchmark results for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and 23 benchmark results for Grok 4.7, but they overlap on a single test: CyberGym, where Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores 86.2% against 80.3%.

Grok 4.7 is available through an API at $2 per million input tokens with a 500K-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.

CharacteristicGemini 3.8 Flash CyberGrok 4.7
CompanyGooglexAI
Release DateSeptember 2, 2026September 21, 2026
Parameters——
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)—500K
Input Price / 1M—$2.00
Output Price / 1M—$6.00
Average Score74.6%56.5%
Benchmarks
CyberGym86.2%80.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Grok 4.7
CyberGym0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Grok 4.7 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber — 0.7, Grok 4.7 — 0.6.

Recency

Grok 4.7 is newer: released 9/21/2026 vs 9/2/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Grok 4.7?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Grok 4.7?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Grok 4.7?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Grok 4.7 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.