Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Ling 3.0 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google, while Ling 3.0 Flash comes from InclusionAI. Ling 3.0 Flash was released in August 2026, and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber followed a month later in September 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash has a published size of about 124 billion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.
We have 4 benchmark results for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and 19 benchmark results for Ling 3.0 Flash, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.
Ling 3.0 Flash is available through an API at $0.06 per million input tokens with a 131K-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Ling 3.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | InclusionAI | |
| Release Date | September 2, 2026 | August 4, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 124B |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Context (input) | — | 131K |
| Context (output) | — | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | — | $0.06 |
| Output Price / 1M | — | $0.18 |
| Average Score | 74.6% | 68.5% |
Verdict
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber — 0.7, Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7.
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is newer: released 9/2/2026 vs 8/4/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Ling 3.0 Flash?
The Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Ling 3.0 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Ling 3.0 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.